Chú thích Thomas_Cranmer

  1. Ridley 1962, tr. 13. The only authority for the date of his birth (2 July) is, according to Ridley, an anonymous biographer who wrote shortly after Cranmer’s death. The biographer makes several mistakes about Cranmer’s early life.
  2. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 109
  3. 1 2 Ridley 1962, tr. 13–15; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 7–15
  4. Ridley 1962, tr. 16; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 19–21
  5. Ridley 1962, tr. 16–20; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 21–23
  6. Bernard 2005, tr. 506; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 23–33
  7. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 33–37
  8. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 42. According to MacCulloch, he became convinced of this perhaps as much as two years before his passion for Anne Boleyn.
  9. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 41–44
  10. Ridley 1996, tr. 25–33; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 45–51
  11. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 54–59. The full title is The Determinations of the most famous and most excellent Universities of Italy and France, that it is unlawful for a man to marry his brother's wife, that the Pope hath no power to dispense therewith and it is likely that Cranmer undertook the translation from Latin to English. Comparing the two language versions, MacCulloch notes that the document reveals the first indications of a change away from his humanist Catholicism towards a more radically reformist stance.
  12. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 60–66
  13. Ridley 1962, tr. 39
  14. Hall(1) 1993, tr. 19; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 72; Ridley 1962, tr. 46
  15. Ayris(1) 1993, tr. 116–117
  16. Ridley 1996, tr. 49–53; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 75–77
  17. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 637–638
  18. Ridley 1996, tr. 53–58; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 83–89
  19. Ridley 1962, tr. 59–63
  20. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 90–94
  21. 1 2 MacCulloch 1996, tr. 97–98
  22. Ridley 1996, tr. 67–68
  23. Bernard 2005, tr. 507; Ridley 1996, tr. 87–88
  24. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 98–102, 109–115
  25. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 91–92, 133
  26. Ayris(5) 2000, tr. 81–86; Ayris(1) 1993, tr. 125–130
  27. Ridley 1996, tr. 91–92
  28. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 127–135
  29. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 149
  30. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 154; Schofield 2008, tr. 119
  31. Ridley 1962, tr. 100–104; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 157–158
  32. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 149–159
  33. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 160–166
  34. Ridley 1962, tr. 113–115
  35. Ridley 1962, tr. 115–118; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 169–172
  36. Ridley 1962, tr. 118–123; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 185–196, 205
  37. Ridley 1962, tr. 123–125
  38. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 205–213
  39. Ridley 1962, tr. 161–165; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 213–221
  40. Ridley 1962, tr. 180
  41. Ridley 1962, tr. 178–184; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 235–250
  42. Ridley 1962, tr. 195–206; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 238, 256–274
  43. Howell 1816, tr. 433–440. According to Howell, several charges were brought against him but the chief one was heresy.
  44. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 275
  45. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 280
  46. Ridley 1962, tr. 217–223; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 274–289
  47. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 362
  48. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 297–308
  49. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 308–311
  50. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 316. It is not known why Henry took so long to react to the charges against Cranmer. MacCulloch notes that it was Henry's nature to brood over the evidence against his archbishop. He also speculates that Cranmer's support of the King's Book made Henry reflect about whether the charges were serious. Another possibility is that in playing the situation out, Henry could observe the behaviour of the leading politicians until he was ready to intervene.
  51. Ridley 1962, tr. 235–238
  52. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 316–322
  53. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 327–329, 347
  54. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 352–361
  55. Bagchi & Steinmetz 2004, tr. 155
  56. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 375
  57. Ridley 1962, tr. 265–270; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 365, 369–376
  58. Hall(2) 1993, tr. 227–228; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 380–382
  59. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 421–422
  60. Hall(2) 1993, tr. 223–224
  61. Ridley 1962, tr. 284; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 405–406
  62. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 395–398, 405–408; Ridley 1962, tr. 285–289
  63. Spinks 1993, tr. 177
  64. Robinson 1998, tr. 82; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 414–417
  65. Ridley 1962, tr. 293–297
  66. Loades 1993, tr. 160; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 443–447. MacCulloch claims that Paget supported Seymour, but according to Loades it was only Smith who joined with Cranmer. Loades also states that it was likely Cranmer who persuaded Seymour to surrender.
  67. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 454–459
  68. Ayris(3) 2005, tr. 97–99
  69. Ridley 1962, tr. 322–323; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 460–469
  70. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 410–411
  71. Loades 2004, tr. 109–111. According to Loades, a felony, a lesser crime than treason in English law, included gathering men unlawfully and plotting the death of a councillor. Seymour admitted to these actions.
  72. 1 2 MacCulloch 1996, tr. 520
  73. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 493–500
  74. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 501–502
  75. Ayris(2) 1993, tr. 318–321; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 500–502, 518–520, 533
  76. Bagchi & Steinmetz 2004, tr. 158–159
  77. Ridley 1962, tr. 322–327; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 504–513
  78. Heinze 1993, tr. 263–264
  79. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 547–553
  80. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 554–555, 561–562, 572–573 Cf. "ai bền chí cho đến cuối cùng thì sẽ được cứu rỗi" (Phúc âm Ma-thi-ơ 10:22)
  81. Heinze 1993, tr. 267–271; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 574–582
  82. Heinze 1993, tr. 273–276; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 584–599. Heinze and MacCulloch note that Cranmer's recantations can be deduced from two primary sources that had opposite polemical aims, Bishop Cranmer's Recantacyons by an unknown author and Acts and Monuments by John Foxe also known as Foxe's Book of Martyrs.
  83. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 597
  84. Heinze 1993, tr. 279; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 603
  85. Heinze 1993, tr. 277–280; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 600–605. According to Heinze and MacCulloch, an additional corroborating account of Cranmer's execution is found in the letter of a Catholic witness with the initials J. A.
  86. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 620–621
  87. Stevenson 1993, tr. 189–198; MacCulloch 1996, tr. 420–421. Stevenson adds that the marriage vow from the Prayer Book occupies a singular place in the cultural life of the English language.
  88. MacCulloch 1996, tr. 630–632
  89. Overell 2008, tr. 207
  90. Ridley 1962, tr. 11–12; Null 2006, tr. 2–17. Null provides an overview of Cranmer scholarship and the different points-of-view.
  91. Heinze 1993, tr. 279
  92. Holy Days in the Calendar of the Church of England
  93. al.], editors, Charles Hefling, Cynthia Shattuck; editorial advisory board, Colin Buchanan... [et (2006). The Oxford guide to the Book of common prayer a worldwide survey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. tr. 210. ISBN 0199723893
  94. Marriage Liturgy (Lễ Hôn phối)
  95. The Litany (Cầu nguyện), p. 54
  96. Evening Prayer (Cầu nguyện buổi tối), A Collect for Aid against Perils, p. 31
  97. 1 2 A General Confession (Xưng tội), p. 6
  98. Holy Communion (Tiệc Thánh), The Collect, p. 67
  99. A General Thanksgiving (Tạ ơn), p. 19
  100. Burial of the Dead (Lễ An táng), p. 332

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Thomas_Cranmer http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5048524774 http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/cramner-hen8... http://englishhistory.net/tudor/pcranmer.html http://www.anglicancommunion.org/resources/acis/do... http://www.archive.org/details/theworksofthomas01c... http://www.archive.org/details/theworksofthomas02c... http://www.churchofengland.org/prayer-worship/wors... //dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F361140 //dx.doi.org/10.1558%2Frrr.v0i2.94 //www.worldcat.org/issn/1744-1366